If you are an ultra-rich oil baron for whom petroleum is the basis of all your wealth and poweryou are going to fight the solar power industry like you were a cornered wolverine. Just try to find a CEOs of telephone-directories, newspaper, encyclopedia, and magazine publishers who has anything nice to say about the advent of the internet. All of those publishers are rapidly going bankrupt. Such powerful people want the status quo antethank you very much.
Sunday, August 21, I teach a course on 1 Corinthians at the seminary, have used the commentaries you cite as textbooks, and have more familiarity with the literature generally than you do.
Partaking in sexual immorality most certainly does have to do with paganism. It has to do, at least in part, with a return to the immoral lifestyles out of which they emerged, though Paul admits in the case of incest they are even outdoing the pagans in immorality.
Paul repeatedly warns Gentile converts in all his letters not to live as they once lived as Gentiles who did not know God. In 1 Thess 4, Gal 5, 1 Cor2 Cor 12, Romans 1, 6, 8, 13not to mention texts in Col 3Ephand the Pastoral Epistles, Paul repeatedly states that if believers adopt again their old Gentile practices, especially sexually immoral practices, they will not inherit the kingdom of God.
The argument of silence comes entirely from you, not me; although in your case it is more an ignoring of multiple texts. Nor is it possible to ignore these texts simply because they include vice or offender lists, because in most of the cases cited above Paul buttresses the list with his own theological elaboration to make the same point.
For example, the vice list in 1 Cor 6: The reason why the community is to put him temporarily out of the community until he comes to his senses is that this is a last-ditch measure to wake the offender up, lest he be excluded from the kingdom. Paul goes on to reiterate the point of the vice list of 6: Similar issues arise in 1 Thess 4 where Paul reminds the Thessalonian believers that Fallacies in prop 8 commercial essay warned them before and now warns them again that if they return to their old Gentile sexual behaviors they will have rejected God who will be an avenging force against them.
It is not necessary for a Christian to renounce Christ in order to engage in such behaviors and thereby put himself or herself at risk of losing eternal life.
The incestuous man claimed to be a believer. When introducing the offender list in 6: Contrary to what you say, the commentators do not state that knowledge, not sexual immorality, is a problem. Bad use of knowledge is certainly a key problem.
But the fact that Paul spends chs. The only place in the letter where he explicitly recommends removal of a member from the community in a letter that you rightly note often focuses on unity is over a question of sexual immorality ch. To make the claim you make is to indicate an inadequate knowledge of Pauline thought.
Paul says next to nothing about bad theology in chs. He is concerned about its impact on the community but the impact he is concerned about is sending the message that sexual offense is no big deal i.
On the contrary, Paul was the one who imposed such standards on all his communities. The strong were wrong for insisting to the weak that they should live out their freedom in Christ even if it meant violating their consciences by getting them to do something that the weak still thought was wrong i.
So why stop at homosexuality? We could criticize just about everyone on earth by this logic. First, you simply ignore the fact that Paul does indeed say that men having sex with males, adulterers, and other sexually immoral persons like the incestuous man and those having sex with prostitutes will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Second, Paul is highlighting in 1 Cor 6: The sexual offenses he cites are high sexual offenses. In Matt 5 he precedes this utterance with the precise kind of warning that you deny exists: If your hand, eye, or foot threatens your downfall, cut it off because it is better to go into heaven maimed than to go into hell full-bodied.
Jesus was trying to dissuade remarriage after divorce but it is highly unlikely that he would have required all remarried-after-divorce listeners to dissolve their remarriages he undoubtedly would have called on all adulterers to cease adulterous relationships: Rather, the remarried person must live out their current marriage without divorce and in fidelity.
Homosexual practice is certainly not the only sin for the church to criticize. We should indeed be concerned about divorce in the church; but not even Jesus regarded divorce as great a violation as homosexual activity.
The male-female prerequisite for sexual relations was for Jesus the foundation; the limitation to two sex partners whether serial or concurrent and the indissolubility of the union are points extrapolated from this foundation, i.
By definition homosexual practice is more serious than divorce because it is a direct violation of a male-female prerequisite on which the divorce prohibition is based. There are many indications in Scripture and in the context of early Judaism that homosexual practice is the most severe consensual sexual offense among humans bestiality is worse but that involves a cross-species act: Not only is homosexual practice a foundational violation, it is the only immorality being foisted on the church as a positive good, with the larger society moving toward persecuting and ostracizing anyone who disagrees that is a good.
So like any endangered species, the church has a duty to give the matter special attention. Paul never, as you put it, simply hoped that people would become Christians and sort out for themselves what ethical behavior God requires. Why do you think Paul devoted so much of his letters to moral exhortations, including specific exhortations and prohibitions?The best opinions, comments and analysis from The Telegraph.
Of all the exposés and scandals surrounding the media's coverage of the Israel-Hezbollah conflict in Lebanon, The Red Cross Ambulance Incident stands out as the most serious. The other exposés were spectacular in their simplicity (photographers staging scenes, clumsy attempts at Photoshopping images), but often concerned fairly trivial details.
All Episodes in reverse order (): Date (Y-M-D) / Episode: Media: Personalities: Episode Description: mp3, DVD, Video: Jen Peeples and Clare Wuellner: Difficulties in accepting evoluton.
Clare talks more about the difficulties people have in accepting evolution. Fallacies are defects that have the power to weaken an argument. Fallacious arguments are much more common than we may think, and they tend be persuasive to the casual listener or reader.
Politicians, celebrities, and advertisement commercials constantly make . Article Rebuttal Paper from US economy provides in her article entitled “What is The American Dream” a host of ideas of what is projected to be what citizens of these great states call the American Dream, the way of life, living the life.
My first reaction to this post was “Wow, what a bad reason to change your attitudes.” My reaction upon reflection was to notice that I was a leftish neoliberal in my conservative Bible Belt high school, and in my left-wing liberal arts college I became more libertarian, but also more culturally radical so no one could confuse me for one of those Lew Rockwell-type conservative libertarians.